I was sent an email today which essentially was a remembrance of those halcyon days of old when expectant mothers could smoke and drink and, heck!, we'd turn out OK, and would do all sorts of now-known-as-stupid-things and get away with them and live anyway. Frankly, I thought whoever wrote it was probably having a bad day and needed some reminder of just how good things were when, heck, his parents would occasionally beat the shit out of him - a good beating was always good for teaching a kid a lesson - and, heck! -- they'd lived to write fond remembrances! My reply was a tad less wistful, since I think, through years of expensive psychoanalysis, I don't have any longings for those days. OK, maybe I DO wish that "Get Smart" was on the air seven days a week. But that's about it. Everything has changed and all not for the better, but certainly just because we lived through the grace of fate and God, if you are into that sort of thing -- doesn't make it all just hunky-dory. Shit, the Girl Scouts have been making their cookies with the same artery clogging gunk for years and years, and nobody until Nic Kristof (at least that I am aware) has raised the spectre of the little angels of death disguised as girl scounts ambling down the street, purveying their killer cookies at an unassuming, past-wistful public.
Where is the government? What is it doing to stop this outrage! I suppose its attention is pointed toward catching terrorists on the phone or by email, or in catching all those terrorists that we see when travelling who are disguised as 5'6" 245 lb. married women from Des Moines named Wojelinski who invariably are squeezed into a pair of brown polyester pants and a matching top - not too tight-- but that same wretched polyester design straight from, well, the sale rack at Kohl's - end of season sale. (Why I divert to the excesses of our government is an interesting question here worthy perhaps - in my own mind anyway - of its own discussion, but I digress from my digression --) In any event, what's the deal? Stop these purveyors of arterial clot and cloggery! Before we are all victims of the bypass-surgeon's knife, thank you very much! I'd like to live as long as I am supposed to without the help of an avoidable risk like Girl Scout Cookies. (Does this mean I can still smoke a cigar once in a while if I continue to lay off the cookies? There has to be some balance in the healthy-living equation, doesn't there?)
Lay off those cookies. Give the little death-dealing petite-she-killers some money, but for God's sake, and that of your arteries to and from your heart, no more Peanut Butter Sandies, please! Just because the Girl Scout cookies, like so few things in our hustlebustle-check-your-email-attend-that-meeting lives, remind us of those idyllic days of our childhoods and youth when killers disguised as Girl Scouts could roam free on our streets and,unknowingly, in our bloodstreams, too, doesnt' mean that we have to keep on doing it wrong. For the repetition of a wrong way of doing something - including eating Girl Scount cookies with trans-fats when there is scientific proof to tell you NOT to eat such stuff -- is the definition of ignorance. Remember? We lived. Despite our ignorance. And so forth.
Have a good week.
RS
May 21, 2006
Op-Ed Columnist
Killer Girl Scouts
By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF
I've been taking my daughter around the block lately, helping her unload Girl Scout cookies on obliging neighbors — and wondering whether we're killing them.
The problem is that most of those Girl Scout cookies have trans fatty acids. Those are the worst kind of fat, killing far more Americans than Al Qaeda manages to.
Trans fats, those nasty partially hydrogenated vegetable oils, clog up your arteries, raising bad cholesterol and lowering good cholesterol. They are estimated to kill 30,000 Americans annually and maybe more.
One recent study linked trans fats to diabetes and other ailments and suggested that they might cause up to 228,000 heart attacks (including nonfatal ones) each year.
The Institute of Medicine of the National Academies suggested in 2002 that "trans fatty acid consumption be as low as possible." A tolerable upper intake level, the report said, is zero.
Maybe it's unfair to pick on the Girl Scouts, because trans fats are all around us, from French fries to some brands of ice cream. And at least the Girl Scouts have taken trans fats out of some of their cookies (though of the eight kinds my daughter's Brownie troop sold, only Lemon Coolers and Tagalongs seemed to have none).
But that's the problem we have in risk assessments. There are certain kinds of risks — say, fears of Saddam Hussein — that galvanize us to mobilize an army and devote $1 trillion to confront the challenge. Meanwhile, we do nothing about threats that are much more likely to kill us — like trans fats peddled by cute little girls.
Actually, it's a pity that Girl Scout cookies are being sold by cherubs. If the sellers were Iranians with turbans and menacing frowns, then the authorities might be more alert to the dangers.
The Food and Drug Administration has required food companies to list trans fats in labels of packaged products, so companies are beginning to remove trans fats from their foods. Kraft, for example, has removed trans fats from all of its Oreos and many other foods.
But Americans now get 38 percent of their calories from restaurant food, and the F.D.A. so far has refused to require restaurants to disclose trans fat content. The Center for Science in the Public Interest has filed a petition asking the F.D.A. to require restaurants to disclose the presence of trans fats in their foods, as well as another petition that would in effect come close to banning manufactured trans fats altogether.
Both moves make sense. Denmark, for example, has quite successfully adopted a law stipulating that no more than 2 percent of the fats in foods sold there can be industrially produced trans fats.
The result is that if you walk into a McDonald's in Copenhagen and order a large meal of chicken nuggets and French fries, you'll get just 0.33 grams of trans fatty acids. Walk into a McDonald's in the U.S. and order the same meal, and you get 10.1 grams of trans fats.
That was the finding of a study published last month in The New England Journal of Medicine. It found huge variations: an order of fries and chicken at KFC provided almost 25 grams of trans fats in Hungary, but negligible amounts in Denmark, Russia and Wiesbaden, Germany.
To put those numbers in perspective, just five grams of trans fats per day are associated with a 25 percent greater risk of a heart attack.
Prowl a supermarket, and you see that Pop Secret Butter Microwave Popcorn has 5 grams of trans fats per serving, Keebler Chips Deluxe cookies have 1.5 grams of trans fats per cookie, and Drake's Yodels and Ring Dings have 2 grams. At Denny's, carrot cake has 3 grams.
It's difficult for the food industry to claim that trans fats are unavoidable when the Danes manage to avoid them. And there's no justification for letting restaurants inflict them on us without informing us.
Look, there are a lot of risks that we can't do much about. Brain tumors, for example. Or plane crashes. Or foreign leaders who are absolutely determined to produce nuclear weapons. But trans fats kill more Americans than any of those, and they're very easy to protect against — so I hope the Bush administration will follow the Danish model and curb the use of trans fats.
And in the meantime (now that my daughter has finished selling her cookies), here's a step you can take: Set up a neighborhood watch team to be alert for little girls intent on clogging your arteries and killing you with their sweetness.
Randy's Corner Deli Library
21 May 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment